Critics call for transparency in Canada's chicken import quota system

OTTAWA · Critics are demanding more openness in how Canada distributes its limited chicken import quotas, saying the current system lacks transparency and may inflate consumer prices. The rules allow businesses that receive government-issued import permissions to sell that access to other companies for a profit. An industry source estimates these annual allocations could be worth around $243 million if traded at a rate of $2 per kilogram. Sylvain Charlebois, a food policy professor at Dalhousie University, argues Canadians deserve to know who profits from these rules. He wrote that supply management requires accepting competition restrictions, which makes transparency more necessary.

Canada permits a set amount of foreign chicken to enter the country each year at reduced tariffs under international trade deals. For 2026, this access totals about 121.6 million kilograms. The government allocates these tariff-rate quotas to eligible businesses, granting them permission to import at the lower duty. This permission itself holds significant commercial value. Companies can then apply to transfer their allocation to another firm, sometimes for a payment. "The obvious question is why a business should have to pay another company for access that Ottawa allocated in the first place," Charlebois wrote.

Major chicken processors like Maple Leaf Foods, Maple Lodge Farms, Olymel and Sofina Foods are key players in the system. An industry source estimates primary processors collectively receive about 75 million kilograms of import access, roughly 62 percent of the total. Under some trade agreements, such as the CPTPP, 85 percent of import access is allocated to processors based on their market share. This means larger companies handling more chicken can qualify for more valuable import rights. Charlebois notes that when smaller processors must pay for access, that cost can be passed on to consumers.

READ MORE: Costco members share tips on saving beyond groceries

READ MORE: GLP-1 drugs and new technologies reshaping Canadian food industry

The system's lack of public data is a central concern. The same industry source reports substantial payments for transferring access, but there is no public information on how much quota is transferred, the prices paid, or the revenue collected by individual holders. Charlebois argues Ottawa should publish company-level allocations and disclose approved transfer volumes and payments. He wrote that Ottawa should require reporting of associated payments and publish enough information to establish who collects revenue and which businesses bear the cost.

Questions also surround whether all available import access is being used. Data from Global Affairs Canada cited in an October 17 report showed permits issued for about 100.3 million kilograms of chicken, leaving 21.3 million kilograms of the annual access unused. Charlebois cautions that these figures are from an unfinished year and issued permits are not the same as completed imports. However, he says it justifies examining whether deadlines and reallocation procedures give other businesses enough time to source and bring chicken into Canada.

Charlebois recommends reforming the allocation policy to prioritize whether a business is ready to import and supply the market. He calls for phasing out paid transfers alongside a system for returning and reassigning unused access. "Ottawa grants the privilege, allocation holders can collect the payment, and consumers can end up footing the bill," he wrote. He concludes that if rules allow businesses to collect money from others seeking to use import rights, Canadians deserve to see the bill.

With files from Canadian Grocer and Toronto Sun